[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] required-extension-version (possible version-numbe

From: Ivan Raikov
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] required-extension-version (possible version-numbers> issue)
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:55:55 +0900
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux)

  Yes, that's exactly what I have been trying to say. If you use the
same consistent versioning format, then chicken-setup will work
correctly, regardless of whether the format is x.x.x or, or
whatever. But if you switch from one format to another, then you risk
messing up the version order. So the moral of the story is, do use
consistent versioning format.


Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden> writes:

> Actually I think the real problem is that lookup-table uses two
> different and incompatible versioning schemes.
> Maybe egg authors should stick to either xx.xx or xx.xx.xx forms, and
> should not combine them for the same egg.
> That would solve the problem, wouldn't it?
> Best wishes,
> Mario

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]