Re: [Chicken-hackers] serious bug ? in units and set!

[Thomas Bushnell BSG]

On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 10:30 +0200, Thomas Chust wrote:
> 2009/9/22 Thomas Bushnell BSG <address@hidden>:
> > What are you talking about?  Nothing in test2.scm establishes a binding
> > for foo.
> > [...]
> 
> Hello,
> 
> (set! foo 'whiz) at the top level with no previously defined variable
> called foo *does* establish a binding for foo.

Of course.  But test2.scm has no set! at top level:

  (declare (unit test2) (export blah))
  (define (blah) (display (format "foo: ~s\n" foo)) (set! foo 'whiz))

Thomas