Re: [Chicken-hackers] using llvm-gcc/clang

[Peter Bex]

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:39:02PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> 
> I've tested CHICKEN with llvm-gcc and clang and can report that it
> builds and runs successfully. Performance with llvm-gcc is roughly
> equivalent to gcc. clang produces somewhat slower code, but that
> may be caused by the fact that I had to disable noreturn and regparm
> function attributes (the former produces errors, the latter segfaults).
> 
> Nothing dramatic, but it's nice to know it works and that there is an
> alternative to gcc.

Neat!

Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth