Re: [Chicken-hackers] inlining + identity of literals

[Jim Ursetto]

What are the subtle implications that are making this a difficult decision? 

On Apr 8, 2010, at 3:22, felix <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hello!
> 
> 
> Something that I'm not sure how to handle: should
> literal quoted data keep its identity when the containing
> code is copied due to inlining? Or should the data be
> copied as well (the latter is the current behaviour).
> Since literals in chicken are mutable, this is somewhat
> subtle, but can actually have practical implications.
> 
> 
> cheers,
> felix
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-hackers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers