[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Suggestion for the ports unit: port-pipe

From: Moritz Heidkamp
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Suggestion for the ports unit: port-pipe
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:45:07 +0200


Thomas Chust <address@hidden> writes:
> If CHICKEN got a procedure for the same purpose, I think it would
> definitely make sense to make it compatible with this calling
> convention as well.

ah, good catch! Being compatible with other Schemes would be a plus.
However positioned arguments are a bit cumbersome for this kind of
procedure as all kinds of combinations are conceivably useful. We could
have `copy-port' built on top of the more flexible keyword version


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]