chicken-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] something equal? to EQUALP


From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] something equal? to EQUALP
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:41:53 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i

On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:16:13AM +0200, Felix wrote:
> Any ideas for a better name? Any considerations that
> should be taken into account?

Maybe equal?* or equal*? or something?  Or equal/=? or equal=? or
equal?/=

The equal?? is a bit confusing because the SSAX tools already use
the double-questionmark convention for procedures that, when applied
to an argument, return predicate procedures (ie, predicate-makers).
See http://wiki.call-cc.org/egg/sxpath  and search for '??'.
I know SSAX isn't exactly "idiomatic" Scheme or a great example,
but I think theirs is a fine convention.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]