[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] something equal? to EQUALP
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] something equal? to EQUALP |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:41:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:16:13AM +0200, Felix wrote:
> Any ideas for a better name? Any considerations that
> should be taken into account?
Maybe equal?* or equal*? or something? Or equal/=? or equal=? or
equal?/=
The equal?? is a bit confusing because the SSAX tools already use
the double-questionmark convention for procedures that, when applied
to an argument, return predicate procedures (ie, predicate-makers).
See http://wiki.call-cc.org/egg/sxpath and search for '??'.
I know SSAX isn't exactly "idiomatic" Scheme or a great example,
but I think theirs is a fine convention.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth