Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] no EOVERFLOW on Windows?

[Christian Kellermann]

* Alan Post <address@hidden> [111012 15:21]:
> This patch looks fine to me, on OpenBSD there is no errno value for
> 0, and I think strerror in that case returns something like "no
> error."  This define therefor isn't conflicting with an existing
> errno condition that could be returned from stat or another syscall.
> 
> (I understand this define won't be triggered on OpenBSD; I'm using
> that operating system as my example.)
> 

Ok, pushed.

-- 
Who can (make) the muddy water (clear)? Let it be still, and it will
gradually become clear. Who can secure the condition of rest? Let
movement go on, and the condition of rest will gradually arise.
 -- Lao Tse.