Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway union types in scrutinizer

[Mario Domenech Goulart]

On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:31:36 -0400 Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden> 
wrote:

> On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:43:45 +0100 (CET) Felix <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> From: Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden>
>> Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway union types in 
>> scrutinizer
>> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:05:43 -0400
>> 
>>> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:28:19 +0100 (CET) Felix <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The attached patch cuts off union ("or") types beyond a certain
>>>> length.  This can happen in complex list literals and pattern matching
>>>> constructs and slows compilation down to a crawl since these types are
>>>> again and again walked during simplification. 
>>>>
>>>> This fixes ticket #711.
>>> 
>>> Does this patch depend on another one?  I can't apply it directly on the
>>> master HEAD.
>>
>> Here it is again. Please try this one.
>
> Works fine, thanks a lot.  I've closed #711.

Forgot to mention that I've also pushed to master.


Best wishes.
Mario
-- 
http://parenteses.org/mario