Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway union types in scrutinizer

[Felix]

From: Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway union types in scrutinizer
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:33:45 -0400

> On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:31:36 -0400 Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden> 
> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:43:45 +0100 (CET) Felix <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden>
>>> Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway union types in 
>>> scrutinizer
>>> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:05:43 -0400
>>> 
>>>> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:28:19 +0100 (CET) Felix <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> The attached patch cuts off union ("or") types beyond a certain
>>>>> length.  This can happen in complex list literals and pattern matching
>>>>> constructs and slows compilation down to a crawl since these types are
>>>>> again and again walked during simplification. 
>>>>>
>>>>> This fixes ticket #711.
>>>> 
>>>> Does this patch depend on another one?  I can't apply it directly on the
>>>> master HEAD.
>>>
>>> Here it is again. Please try this one.
>>
>> Works fine, thanks a lot.  I've closed #711.
> 
> Forgot to mention that I've also pushed to master.

Thanks, Mario.


cheers,
felix