chicken-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATH] Use hash table instead of flat list for lam


From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATH] Use hash table instead of flat list for lambda literals
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:14:38 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 03:11:05PM -0700, Alan Post wrote:
> I do think that choice is fine, yes.  Does the hash table resize
> itself when it gets too many entries in it?

No, unfortunately these hash tables are pretty basic and too low-level
to do such things.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]