Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Bugfix for #791 and unpack flonums correctly for integer?

[Peter Bex]

On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:52:18AM +0100, Christian Kellermann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> attached is a patch that Peter came up with which I think is ok. I
> have added some (preliminary) test cases for the integer? and
> rational? predicate. number? should be added too one time.
> 
> As it still is 64bit-less sunday, I cannot test this on 64bit. "It
> should work"...at least it does not break anything on 32bit systems :)

I've tested it on a 64-bits machine and all tests pass.

Since I wrote the original patch, I didn't want to push it,
so someone else can have the opportunity to look at it.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth