Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Types database entry for NOT is wrong

[Christian Kellermann]

* Peter Bex <address@hidden> [120317 20:57]:
> Hi all,
> 
> I found this entry in types.db with the help of Aubrey Jaffer's r4rs tests
> which I'm refactoring to use the test egg, for the numbers egg:
> 
> (not (#(procedure #:pure) not (*) boolean)
>      (((not boolean)) (let ((#(tmp) #(1))) '#t)))
> 
> This innocuous-looking entry is actually wrong; anything that's not a
> boolean is considered to be true, so inverting it with NOT should result
> in #f, not #t!

#t...

I have pushed this, thank you Peter.

Kind regards,

Christian

-- 
9 out of 10 voices in my head say, that I am crazy,
one is humming.