Re: [Chicken-hackers] OS X: clang's failing 'make check' w/ 4.8.0rc3 tarball

[Peter Bex]

On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 03:06:36PM -0700, Derrell Piper wrote:
> 
> >Thanks for reporting that.  It's probably the same case as
> >http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/917
> 
> Well, no.  The clang warnings are not the problem.  I think it's this
> scrutinizer test that's failing:
> 
> --- scrutiny.expected 2012-08-30 22:00:02.000000000 -0700
> +++ scrutiny.out      2012-09-09 15:05:22.000000000 -0700
> @@ -97,3 +97,17 @@
>    (scrutiny-tests.scm:136) in procedure call to `+', expected argument #2 of 
> type `number', but was given an argument of type `symbol'
>  
>  Warning: redefinition of standard binding: car
> \ No newline at end of file

That's just the "context" leading up to the actual diff, which are
the lines preceded by the + signs.  The scrutiny tests are actually
testing that there's a warning shown when incorrect types are being
used, so it's correct that the warning is there.  This may be a
little confusing, I know.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth