[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] posix: Add optional atomic? argument to cr
From: |
richo |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] posix: Add optional atomic? argument to create-directory |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:20:36 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On 04/02/13 11:17 +1100, Richo Healey wrote:
The atomic flag skips the check for directory existance, making it
appropriate for dotlocks etc.
This also begins unifying some of the duplicated code from posixwin and
posixunix to a central interface in posix-common which calls out to
helpers in the platform specific modules.
---
< Patch snipped >
Sorry guys, my git send-email fu is rusty and I thought I would be able to
edit this before sending.
I have some followup questions- Because the helper code includes
posix-common, I had to uninline the helper definitions. Given that there's an
implicit recursion limit on this, is the overhead of the extra frame a
concern? Should I be trying to work around this?
--
richo || Today's excuse:
Satan did it
http://blog.psych0tik.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] posix: Add optional atomic? argument to create-directory,
richo <=