Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Adding iset to core and using it for Unicode-capable SRFI-14.

[Alex Shinn]

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Alex Shinn <address@hidden> wrote:

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Felix <address@hidden> wrote:

>
> That's why I asked in advance what people wanted
> (is lib size or runtime memory or speed more important?),
> and since the only response I got was "could you provide
> a patch" I sent what I think is the best option.
>
> If we want to trim down the size, there's quite a lot that
> can be removed from iset.  Almost all of the bit-vector
> operations can be removed, and because of the odd way
> I defined those I believe that's taking up most of the
> space.

I want lib-size and speed, please.

Well, these are diametrically opposed, but right now

Chicken doesn't have either :)

By which I mean, of course, the Chicken srfi-14

implementation, not Chicken itself.

-- 

Alex