[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] substring function and bounds checks
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] substring function and bounds checks |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Feb 2013 20:20:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Michele La Monaca scripsit:
> The funny thing looking at the implementation is that it actually does
> the check (so no speed) only to have a better opportunity to crash
> (so no safety).
Raising an exception is not crashing. Crashing means that no recovery
is possible within the Scheme process, which is not the case here.
--
Evolutionary psychology is the theory John Cowan
that men are nothing but horn-dogs, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and that women only want them for their money. address@hidden
--Susan McCarthy (adapted)
Re: [Chicken-hackers] substring function and bounds checks, Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/02/05
Re: [Chicken-hackers] substring function and bounds checks, Felix, 2013/02/05
Re: [Chicken-hackers] substring function and bounds checks, Jim Ursetto, 2013/02/05