chicken-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Re: mutex-lock! in types.db


From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Re: mutex-lock! in types.db
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:40:34 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 07:14:56PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote:
> You're right, the SRFI-18 docs clearly state that an explicit #f is
> also allowed, not just leaving off the argument.
> 
> Attached is a patch for this, which I nominate for inclusion in the
> stability branch.  It's so trivial I didn't bother to add a NEWS
> entry; feel free to write one up if you think it's important.

Git malfunctioned (or more likely, my brain did).  Here's another try.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://www.more-magic.net

Attachment: 0001-Fix-mutex-unlock-type-signature-thanks-to-Joerg-Witt.patch
Description: Text document


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]