[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Re: mutex-lock! in types.db
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Re: mutex-lock! in types.db |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:40:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 07:14:56PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote:
> You're right, the SRFI-18 docs clearly state that an explicit #f is
> also allowed, not just leaving off the argument.
>
> Attached is a patch for this, which I nominate for inclusion in the
> stability branch. It's so trivial I didn't bother to add a NEWS
> entry; feel free to write one up if you think it's important.
Git malfunctioned (or more likely, my brain did). Here's another try.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
0001-Fix-mutex-unlock-type-signature-thanks-to-Joerg-Witt.patch
Description: Text document