chicken-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline ...)


From: Felix
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline ...))
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:26:16 -0400 (EDT)

From: John Cowan <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline 
...))
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 18:41:10 -0400

> Felix scripsit:
> 
>> This leaves the decision to inline to the compiler
> 
> Excellent.  However, I hope that "notinline" forces the compiler never
> to inline, for the reasons I gave before.  Is that now the case?

Yes, this should be the way it is. A lot of core-library code would break,
otherwise.


cheers,
felix



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]