[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline ...)
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline ...)) |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:26:16 -0400 (EDT) |
From: John Cowan <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline
...))
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 18:41:10 -0400
> Felix scripsit:
>
>> This leaves the decision to inline to the compiler
>
> Excellent. However, I hope that "notinline" forces the compiler never
> to inline, for the reasons I gave before. Is that now the case?
Yes, this should be the way it is. A lot of core-library code would break,
otherwise.
cheers,
felix