[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Apr 2013 22:55:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 10:49:15PM +0200, Felix wrote:
> The patch looks ok to me, even though I'm not sure the benefit of having
> this feature outweights the added complexity, apart from having a little
> bit of extra consistence.
Note that this makes define-values r7rs-compliant.
The alternative is to keep the old definition and provide the slightly
more complicated one in the new "r7rs egg", but I don't know how to make
the internal definitions syntax stuff extensible.
I think internal definition rewriting may be one of the worst warts of
Scheme. R8RS should try to fix this :)
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values, Peter Bex, 2013/04/02
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values, Felix, 2013/04/05
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values,
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values, Felix, 2013/04/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values, Alex Shinn, 2013/04/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values, Felix, 2013/04/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values, Alex Shinn, 2013/04/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values, Felix, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values, Alex Shinn, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values, Felix, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values, John Cowan, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values, Felix, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] extending define-values, Alex Shinn, 2013/04/08