[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] &optional and &rest in type-declarations
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] &optional and &rest in type-declarations |
Date: |
Wed, 8 May 2013 14:41:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:33:18PM +0200, Felix wrote:
> Hello!
>
> As proposed by Joerg Wittenberger, here is a patch for the scrutinizer
> to allow "&optional" and "&rest" as alternatives to "#!optional" and
> "#!rest" in type declarations.
What was the rationale for this, again? It's confusing because
procedures don't allow this syntax.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net