Re: [Chicken-hackers] patch: treat #t as alternative to else in cond

[Evan Hanson]

On 2013-11-15 20:16, Peter Bex wrote:
> This should probably be handled in the scrutinizer

Yeah, as with any warnings in expand.scm that don't deal strictly with
the expansion at hand (so e.g. `else` would be checked, but not others).
But like you said, this is an easy one to warn about here for now.

> Attached is a patch that detects other constants as well, because that
> could be an even more common mistake than a plain #t.

Cool, applied.

Evan