[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133
From: |
Aleksej Saushev |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133 |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jul 2014 21:55:36 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1299999999999999 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) |
Yaroslav Tsarko <address@hidden> writes:
> Besides weird and clumsy syntax CMake has one great advantage
> over herds of others so-called "build systems" (waf, scons, gyp
> ... <put your name here>) - cross compilation, and being a
> packager, you should be aware of that. CMake has indeed decent
> support of it. And this point gives CMake 100 points ahead of
> others "build systems".
No, I strongly disagree on cross-compilation point.
All my experience demonstrates that CMake is no better in cross-compilation
as anything else with exception of autoconf and BSD Make scripts.
--
HE CE3OH...
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133, Oleg Kolosov, 2014/07/02
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133, Aleksej Saushev, 2014/07/03
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133, Yaroslav Tsarko, 2014/07/03
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133, Felix Winkelmann, 2014/07/03
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133, Yaroslav Tsarko, 2014/07/03
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133, Felix Winkelmann, 2014/07/03
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133, Aleksej Saushev, 2014/07/03
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2014/07/04
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133,
Aleksej Saushev <=
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133, Arthur Maciel, 2014/07/06
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133, Arthur Maciel, 2014/07/06