Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee

[Alex Shinn]

On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 4:03 PM, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> There are actually many implementations for which this is an error.
> Notably R6RS requires it to be an error.

Not too many outside R6RS, actually: only RScheme, SXM, SigScheme, UMB,
Dfsch, Foment, Chibi.

> Schemes typically use the name `add1' for this.

This is only available (at least at the REPL) in Racket, Chicken, SISC,
Sizzle, Vicare, IronScheme, RScheme, SXM.

That's still a lot more than provide 1+ out of the box (do any

other than Guile?).

See <http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/PlusOneEx> for details.

You tested the wrong thing - the original question was about

1+, then 1+x was brought up, not +1x.

-- 

Alex