[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Made a start with CHICKEN 5 proposal
From: |
Oleg Kolosov |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Made a start with CHICKEN 5 proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:15:27 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 |
On 08/26/14 21:10, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
>
> I'd expect the compiler to detect when set! is applied to an unbound
> variable and raise an error (or at least a warning).
>
I second that. I can easily remember few recent bugs in our Scheme
project related to this behaviour.
On the other hand, looking at the way CHICKEN does code expansion, this
might be really hard to implement. I hope I'm wrong.
--
Regards, Oleg
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Made a start with CHICKEN 5 proposal, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Made a start with CHICKEN 5 proposal, John Cowan, 2014/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Made a start with CHICKEN 5 proposal, Oleg Kolosov, 2014/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Made a start with CHICKEN 5 proposal, Peter Bex, 2014/08/27
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Made a start with CHICKEN 5 proposal, Oleg Kolosov, 2014/08/28
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Made a start with CHICKEN 5 proposal, Peter Bex, 2014/08/28
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Made a start with CHICKEN 5 proposal, John Cowan, 2014/08/26
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Made a start with CHICKEN 5 proposal, John Cowan, 2014/08/25
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Made a start with CHICKEN 5 proposal, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2014/08/26
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Made a start with CHICKEN 5 proposal, Oleg Kolosov, 2014/08/29