[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH(5)] Remove srfi-18 and srfi-69

From: Felix Winkelmann
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH(5)] Remove srfi-18 and srfi-69
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:06:06 +0200 (CEST)

> Felix Winkelmann <address@hidden> writes:
>> It includes literal C code directly in the code generated by the compiler.
>> There are a couple of helper functions and macros in there. You can ignore 
>> it,
>> just leave the foreign-declaration as it is. 
> I just wondered whether pulling it out of the declare makes any
> difference. A diff between the generated C files showed no
> difference. Mind you I have no intention to change that if it has some
> subtle implications, I just want to understand it. It looked like an
> oversight to me.

The "foreign-declare" syntax expands into "(declare (foreign-declare


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]