Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add procedure argument checks for srfi-1's list= and lset procedures

[Peter Bex]

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:50:57PM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Here's a very simple patch for #1085.
> 
> As a side note, there are lots of other procedures in srfi-1.scm without
> argument type checks. Are the cases where they're not there intentional,
> or would it be worth looking into adding some, where sensible?
> 
> Either way, I think these lset procedures should have guards added since
> the results can be quite confusing otherwise.

Thanks, I've finally had a chance to look at it and pushed this to
master as well as chicken-5.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://www.more-magic.net