[Chicken-hackers] Bug in numbers egg (perhaps in scrutiny)

[John Cowan]

The following script works correctly in csi, but produces a warning in csc:

(use numbers)
(define (foo x) (odd? x))

The output is as follows:

Warning: in toplevel procedure `foo':
  (foo.scm:2) in procedure call to `numbers#odd?', expected 2 arguments, but 
was given 1 argument

If you comment out "(use numbers)", there is no warning.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        address@hidden
We do, doodley do, doodley do, doodley do,
What we must, muddily must, muddily must, muddily must;
Muddily do, muddily do, muddily do, muddily do,
Until we bust, bodily bust, bodily bust, bodily bust.  --Bokonon