[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] extracting srfi-1 from chicken 5
|
From: |
Felix Winkelmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] extracting srfi-1 from chicken 5 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:19:29 +0100 (CET) |
> If the mini-srfi-1 stuff is only (to be) required in operator position
> it could be given as syntax.
>
Right, depending on how much code is generated. Operators that don't
include a loop are likely to be inlined by the compiler, anyway, who
takes care of avoiding the duplication of values in argument position,
and so on.
felix