[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] numbers stuff

From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] numbers stuff
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 12:49:09 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:39:36PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> Hi, Peter!
> I pushed a small change to numbers-integration-scratchspace, please
> take a look. During build, the scrutinizer produced a warning, due
> to the use of "fp=" in "XXX-time->seconds". I changed this to use "="
> instead, because otherwise the conversion produces an error.

Thanks!  I noticed that because vandusen faithfully announced the commit :)
Looks good to me.

> Another question: should "C_num_to_long" and "C_num_to_unsigned_long"
> handle bignums? The same goes for "C_i_foreign_integer..." and
> friends?

hm, they probably should.  I suppose I overlooked them.  I though
only C_num_to_int was used.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]