[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix an off-by-one size calculation error i

From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix an off-by-one size calculation error in compiler
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 12:57:21 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 05:52:06PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> Looks good, tests good, just one question:
> On 2015-05-23 16:15, Peter Bex wrote:
> > If you look at the generated C code, it will have generated code to
> > allocate 90 words for storing a list of 10 items which are the result
> > of conversion from the C "long" type.
> From where do you get 90? I'd guess you meant 70, but I might be
> misunderstanding something.

Yeah, I meant 70.  I started to type this message based on the
numbers-integration-scratchsace branch (in which is is 90),
but then decided it might make more sense to use master/4.9
I updated the code, but I simply forgot to update that
part of the text.

Sorry about the confusion!


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]