Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Remove comparator type specializations for zero and one arguments

[Peter Bex]

On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 07:08:37PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> Given that it's so widespread to accept this, perhaps the better
> fix is to make sure that CHICKEN 5 supports it once more.
> Either way, right now the compiled version of (=) returns #t
> while the interpreted version raises an exception in CHICKEN 5,
> which is inconsistent.

Here's a patch to restore allowance of zero or single argument calls
of numeric comparator procedures in CHICKEN 5.  It's a little ugly,
as these kind of exceptions generally are, so any cleanups are welcome.

Cheers,
Peter

0001-Allow-for-zero-or-single-argument-numeric-comparison.patch
Description: Text Data

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature