Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Proposal] Officially drop SWIG support?

chicken-hackers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Proposal] Officially drop SWIG support?

From:	Arthur Maciel
Subject:	Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Proposal] Officially drop SWIG support?
Date:	Sun, 14 Jun 2015 13:00:00 -0300

2015-06-14 10:53 GMT-03:00 Peter Bex <address@hidden>:

(...)

So what do you all think? Should we drop SWIG support for CHICKEN 5?
Is anyone still using SWIG?

IMHO we should drop SWIG support for CHICKEN 5. As you've shown it clearly doesn't work anymore and I think CHICKEN 5 code should be as clean as possible.

Best wishes,

Arthur

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[Chicken-hackers] [Proposal] Officially drop SWIG support?, Peter Bex, 2015/06/14
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Proposal] Officially drop SWIG support?, Ivan Raikov, 2015/06/15
  - Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Proposal] Officially drop SWIG support?, Christian Kellermann, 2015/06/16
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Proposal] Officially drop SWIG support?, Arthur Maciel <=

Prev by Date: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Including chicken.h fails for C++11
Next by Date: [Chicken-hackers] [CHICKEN-5] Drop Watcom, Metroworks and Delorie (DJGPP) compilers support and remove references?
Previous by thread: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Proposal] Officially drop SWIG support?
Next by thread: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Including chicken.h fails for C++11
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread