[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] "argvector" chicken (was: ABI woes)
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] "argvector" chicken (was: ABI woes) |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:26:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.21 |
Scripsit address@hidden:
> CPS calls are surprisingly expensive in general in CHICKEN,
Ah, I'm confused now. Are "CPS calls" a specific type of call? I had
assumed that all calls (except to C primitives) are CPS calls.
> I assume that the continuous growth of the stack
> and/or the memory usage pattern in CHICKEN-generated CPS code totally drowns
> any performance advantage than register-passed arguments would give.
Sounds reasonable.
--
- [Chicken-hackers] "argvector" chicken (was: ABI woes), felix . winkelmann, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] "argvector" chicken (was: ABI woes), Ivan Raikov, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] "argvector" chicken (was: ABI woes), John Cowan, 2015/07/21
- [Chicken-hackers] "argvector" chicken (was: ABI woes), felix . winkelmann, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] "argvector" chicken, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] "argvector" chicken (was: ABI woes), Peter Bex, 2015/07/24
- [Chicken-hackers] "argvector" chicken (was: ABI woes), felix . winkelmann, 2015/07/26