[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix unsafe specializations in types.db

From: John Cowan
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix unsafe specializations in types.db
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 17:10:51 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Moritz Heidkamp scripsit:

> The only one I'm a bit unhappy about is `move-memory!' as I couldn't
> find a safe inline version of it. Does anyone have a clue whether there
> is such a thing already?

Presumably that would check lengths only while leaving types to be validated
by the scrutinizer?

John Cowan        address@hidden
    "Any legal document draws most of its meaning from context.  A telegram
    that says 'SELL HUNDRED THOUSAND SHARES IBM SHORT' (only 190 bits in
    5-bit Baudot code plus appropriate headers) is as good a legal document
    as any, even sans digital signature." --me

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]