[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-hackers] PATCH Re: slow polling
From: |
Jörg F . Wittenberger |
Subject: |
[Chicken-hackers] PATCH Re: slow polling |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:39:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux armv7l; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.4.0 |
The "Betthupferl"
Am 19.02.2016 um 18:46 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
> Am 19.02.2016 um 14:02 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
...
> I opened ticket 1259 for this.
>
> To make the kind reviewers job easier, I'll post diffs in piecemeal here.
A "Betthupferl" is Bavarian (a German dialect spoken in some remote,
hilly areas) for the last, small mean given to the kids upon bedtime.
Contradictory to all teachings often a sweet.
This patch is not supposed to do any harm.
It refactors parts of the code to minimize the upcoming diffs.
Furthermore it basically takes srfi-18 out of the equation. Only
whitespace/comment diffs left there.
PS: passes all relevant tests so far.
Cheers
/Jörg
> Details to follow below.
>
> Cheers
>
> /Jörg
>
> To follow the related changes:
>
> 1. Apply
>
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2016-02/msg00032.html
>
> this should just fix a bug
>
> 2. Apply
>
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2016-02/msg00033.html
>
> 3. Apply the attached patch.
>
> This only adds comments: Section headers large enough for "meld" at
> least to pick up the difference. (To both the original and master.)
> You want this to make head or tail of the upcoming changes. Eventually
> there will have to be a cleanup diff to get rid of them.
>
>
0102-Some-refactoring.patch
Description: Text Data
- [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/19
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/19
- [Chicken-hackers] PATCH Re: slow polling,
Jörg F . Wittenberger <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, felix . winkelmann, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24