[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Folding lolevel bindings
|
From: |
Peter Bex |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Folding lolevel bindings |
|
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:33:52 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:14:28PM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> On 2016-02-22 20:43, Peter Bex wrote:
> > There are weird things going on here in any case
>
> Yeah. something to keep in mind if we add such a feature (or rather
> when, amirite?).
yup ;)
> > So maybe for now we should just require lolevel in the compiler, with
> > a clear comment that we're loading it just for the availability of it
> > for constant-folding.
>
> I agree. The attached patches do this.
Thanks, pushed!
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature