[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] A few small performance and scrutiny warni
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] A few small performance and scrutiny warning improvements to assignments |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:56:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 09:18:14PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Good improvements all, pushed.
>
> Regarding your note about special-casing `vector-length`, I'm curious
> why you think it wouldn't make sense? It seems worthwhile to me.
It seems silly to ask the length of a vector that's statically known.
Also, the operation is very cheap. But, we can apply it if you think
it's worthwhile anyway.
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature