Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware

chicken-hackers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware

From:	Evan Hanson
Subject:	Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware ops
Date:	Wed, 24 May 2017 19:04:45 +1200

Thank you both, these have been pushed.

Evan

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware ops, lemonboy, 2017/05/19
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware ops, Peter Bex, 2017/05/19
  - Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware ops, lemonboy, 2017/05/21
    - Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware ops, Peter Bex, 2017/05/21
    - Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware ops, LemonBoy, 2017/05/21
    - Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware ops, Peter Bex, 2017/05/21
    - [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Do not assume all fixnum literals will be fixnums at runtime [was: Re: [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware ops], Peter Bex, 2017/05/21
    - Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Do not assume all fixnum literals will be fixnums at runtime [was: Re: [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware ops], Evan Hanson, 2017/05/24
    - Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Do not assume all fixnum literals will be fixnums at runtime [was: Re: [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware ops], Peter Bex, 2017/05/24
    - Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Do not assume all fixnum literals will be fixnums at runtime [was: Re: [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware ops], Evan Hanson, 2017/05/24
    - Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware ops, Evan Hanson <=

Prev by Date: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!]
Next by Date: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Do not assume all fixnum literals will be fixnums at runtime [was: Re: [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware ops]
Previous by thread: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Do not assume all fixnum literals will be fixnums at runtime [was: Re: [PATCH][5] types.db entries for the overflow-aware ops]
Next by thread: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] Better scrutiny for foreign variables
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread