[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [C5] `extension' components & non-modules
|
From: |
Evan Hanson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [C5] `extension' components & non-modules |
|
Date: |
Thu, 1 Jun 2017 12:20:44 +1200 |
On 2017-05-31 12:19, address@hidden wrote:
> Ok, how about a new .egg extension property named "(modules NAME1 ...)"?
> Defaulting to one module (the extension name). Keeping the list empty
> ("(modules)") specifies an extension without modules.
I like this idea, flexible but with a sane default.
Evan