[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] [5] Make syntax-rules "fully" self-contain
|
From: |
Kooda |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] [5] Make syntax-rules "fully" self-contained |
|
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:11:46 +0200 |
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 21:23:17 +0200 Peter Bex <address@hidden>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 09:19:24PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here's a reasonably simple patch that moves the expansion-time
> > support helpers for ye olde syntax-rules into an internal module in
> > synrules.scm.
>
> Well, not simple enough I guess ;). I decided at the last minute to
> rename "chicken.syntax-rules.internal" to
> "chicken.internal.syntax-rules" which is more consistent with our
> other naming conventions, but forgot to rename the reference in
> expand.scm as well.
>
> This new version of the patch fixes that problem.
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
Looks good! Pushed. :)