[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Handling multiple args in types.db
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Handling multiple args in types.db |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Apr 2019 21:36:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:06:15PM +0300, megane wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Do you think that adding specializations for multiple argument calls to
> mathematical functions is worth it? Like this:
We have a rewrite for this already, I wonder why it's not being applied.
That's (rewrite 'scheme#+ 19) in c-platform.scm (on line 728).
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [Chicken-hackers] Handling multiple args in types.db, megane, 2019/04/26
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Handling multiple args in types.db,
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Handling multiple args in types.db, megane, 2019/04/27
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Handling multiple args in types.db, Peter Bex, 2019/04/27
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Handling multiple args in types.db, megane, 2019/04/27
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Handling multiple args in types.db, Peter Bex, 2019/04/27
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Handling multiple args in types.db, megane, 2019/04/27
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Handling multiple args in types.db, felix . winkelmann, 2019/04/27
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Handling multiple args in types.db, felix . winkelmann, 2019/04/27