[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Mostly fix #1604
|
From: |
felix . winkelmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Mostly fix #1604 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 20 May 2019 13:57:29 +0200 |
> Besides, like I said in the other mail, then we'd still be calling
> allocating functions because (+ fixnum fixnum) => (or fixnum bignum).
> In fixnum mode, we'd want to use the overflowing unsafe fixnum ops.
And I think that is a situation where assuming a specific type is ok,
or at least not dangerous. An overflow is less likely (especially on 64
bit machines) and a weird result may be easier to track down.
felix
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Mostly fix #1604, (continued)
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Mostly fix #1604, felix . winkelmann, 2019/05/19
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Mostly fix #1604, felix . winkelmann, 2019/05/20