Re: [PATCH 0/1] Prevent excessive major gcs by preserving a decent amount of unused heap

[Peter Bex]

On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:10:13AM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> I've played around with this first patch a bit, and I think I've found a
> way to apply the same technique without complicating the logic in
> C_reclaim(). Attached is a sign-off of megane's patch that introduces
> the same min-free requirement, but only at the point where reallocations
> are triggered.

Very nice cleanup, and I like the fact that it's even faster :)

> Here are the benchmarks -- review-0001 (in the middle) is the original
> patch, and review-1001 (on the right) is this version:
> 
>   http://paste.call-cc.org/paste?id=bdadc47d53512e46e563af1830a7bf6b276eb378

What's the deal with the FAIL for knucleotide in both patched versions?

Cheers,
Peter

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature