[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: absolute pathname a.k.a. realpath
|
From: |
Evan Hanson |
|
Subject: |
Re: absolute pathname a.k.a. realpath |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2022 10:22:38 +1300 |
On 2022-10-25 11:52, felix.winkelmann@bevuta.com wrote:
> Does (make-absolute-pathname #f ...) make any sense with the currently
> implemented behaviour? It seems to me that this case could handle the
> operation as requested by sandra.
I think that would be the ideal, yeah, if you could use #f for this.
I just don't know if anyone is relying on the current (useless?)
behaviour, and whether that would need to be considered a breaking
change...
But, breakage aside, it does make the most sense to me!
Evan