[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] fix some problems with the SRFI-4 syntax extensions added re
|
From: |
felix . winkelmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] fix some problems with the SRFI-4 syntax extensions added recently |
|
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jun 2023 12:33:57 +0200 |
> > As Peter remarks, this code is too hairy. I added a comment trying
> > to explain the reason for this.
>
> Thanks for adding a bit of explanation. Are the lists really that long
> though? I'd expect this syntax to be used only in user-typed literals,
> not in data to be read in.
I was thinking of source code, holding large tables of data, for
which this syntax may be useful, perhaps loaded on demand. But it
is just a guess, if you think the hairyness is not warranted, I can
simplify it.
felix