[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-janitors] #1183: Syntax bound via let-syntax not bound in synta
From: |
Chicken Trac |
Subject: |
[Chicken-janitors] #1183: Syntax bound via let-syntax not bound in syntax-rules in its body |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Apr 2015 23:56:05 -0000 |
#1183: Syntax bound via let-syntax not bound in syntax-rules in its body
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: syn | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: someday
Component: expander | Version: 4.9.x
Keywords: |
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
I'm not entirely sure whether this use of `let-syntax` is valid:
{{{
(define-syntax foo
(let-syntax ((bar (syntax-rules ()
((_ x) '(x x)))))
(syntax-rules ()
((_ x) (bar x)))))
(foo 1)
;; Error: unbound variable: bar
}}}
Intuitively it makes sense but the report doesn't seem to say anything
about the semantics of this use and at least Guile and Chibi signal the
same error.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1183>
CHICKEN Scheme <http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/>
CHICKEN Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Chicken-janitors] #1183: Syntax bound via let-syntax not bound in syntax-rules in its body,
Chicken Trac <=