[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A java DEBUG flag
From: |
Bryce McKinlay |
Subject: |
Re: A java DEBUG flag |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Nov 2000 12:19:07 +1300 |
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Does it has to be a compile time constansts?
Yes.
> If we used something like
> System.getProperty("gnu.java.io.serialisation.debugging") to set these
> constants (you can even do that in an interface)
I don't think so ;-)
> then at runtime the
> user could do a -Dgnu.java.io.serialisation.debugging=yes to turn on
> the debugging. (It should at least be an option to have these 'constants'
> compiled in so they can be set dynamicly at runtime IMHO.)
We'll do that as well. To get the debug output you'll have to configure with
"--enable-libgcj-debug" _and_ set the runtime property. But we do want to
have the compile time constants in order to ensure there is _no_ overhead
from the debugging code for an optimized build.
regards
[ bryce ]
- Re: A java DEBUG flag, (continued)
- Re: A java DEBUG flag, Bryce McKinlay, 2000/11/26
- Re: A java DEBUG flag, Brian Jones, 2000/11/27
- Re: A java DEBUG flag, Kevin A. Burton, 2000/11/28
- Re: A java DEBUG flag, Bryce McKinlay, 2000/11/28
- Re: A java DEBUG flag, Brian Jones, 2000/11/28
- Re: A java DEBUG flag, Stuart Ballard, 2000/11/28
- Re: A java DEBUG flag, Brian Jones, 2000/11/29
- Re: A java DEBUG flag, Tom Tromey, 2000/11/29
- Re: A java DEBUG flag, Kevin A. Burton, 2000/11/28
Re: A java DEBUG flag, Mark Wielaard, 2000/11/23
- Re: A java DEBUG flag,
Bryce McKinlay <=
Re: A java DEBUG flag, Kevin A. Burton, 2000/11/24
RE: A java DEBUG flag, Boehm, Hans, 2000/11/29
RE: A java DEBUG flag, Boehm, Hans, 2000/11/29
Re: A java DEBUG flag, Brian Jones, 2000/11/29