Re: classpath ./ChangeLog ./THANKYOU ./configure.in...

[Raif S. Naffah]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Saturday 29 March 2003 18:27, Brian Jones wrote:
> Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
> > >>>>> "Brian" == Brian Jones <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > Brian> There are still some getInstance problems with some of the
> > Brian> things I recently checked in though a check through my Mauve
> > Brian> results appears to indicate nothing terribly new here.
> >
> > Are these getInstance problems revealed by Mauve?
> > Or did you find them some other way?
> > I'd like to put all this java.security stuff into libgcj, but I'd
> > also prefer to wait if there is a regression that will be ironed
> > out soon...
>
> I looked at the Mauve results before and after and essentially the
> same getInstance problems and I don't know much about it other than
> that.  It could just be because I don't have gnu-crypto configured
> with the mauve testing.  Need to investigate.

the Mauve tests for the getInstance() methods (at least those i added 
recently) do not rely/depend on GNU Crypto.  all the testcases, install 
their own, temporary, providers.

to test the patch i submitted earlier, i used my local copy of gcc, to 
which i applied the same patch.  all the security related Mauve tests 
passed.


cheers;
rsn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Que du magnifique

iD8DBQE+hZBE+e1AKnsTRiERA4D8AKDMx3nwhNHKZcw9v8VHaTtLFky7KgCgifot
weqI0s9rNYgv/3fwpYsgzdk=
=JVat
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----