[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shouldn't gnu.java.nio.channels.FileChannelImpl be java.nio.channels
|
From: |
Michael Koch |
|
Subject: |
Re: Shouldn't gnu.java.nio.channels.FileChannelImpl be java.nio.channels.VMFileChannel ? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 5 May 2005 19:43:16 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
mutt-ng 1.5.9-r265i (Debian) |
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:10:02PM +0200, Ewout Prangsma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Based on the VMxxx class guidelines, shouldn't the FileChannelImpl class in
> gnu.java.nio.channels not be VMFileChannel in
> java.nio.channels?
Not totally. Onlz the VM specific parts should be moved into a VMxxxx class.
This means mostly only the native methods should be moved as some of java code
its generic. Its not done zet due to time and syncing constraints.
I will do it before the next release.
Michael
--
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/