[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Anon cvs broken?
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
RE: Anon cvs broken? |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:39:08 +0200 |
Hi Jeroen,
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 13:37 +0200, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> I don't understand, isn't "cvs update" supposed to get the new files
> as well?
New files yes, but not new directories...
I don't know why anyone thought that was good default behavior.
In my ~/.cvrc I have the following to get more sane cvs behavior:
cvs -q -z3
diff -u
update -dP
Meaning "quiet and compress network traffic always", "unidiff by
default", "get new directories and prune empty directories on updates".
Cheers,
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part